+ INFORMATION

Share on social networks!

The validity of the anonymous complaint

Compliance: Jurisprudence on anonymous complaints

The Supreme Court, through its Criminal Chamber, ruled in ruling 272/2020, dated February 6, 2020, validating the use of an anonymous complaint as a source to investigate crimes within a company.

It addresses issues related to Compliance, such as the importance of having a regulatory compliance system and highlights the importance of initiating an investigation following a complaint in the event that the company lacks a regulatory compliance program.

In the matter dealt with in said ruling, the company received the complaint through the Human Resources department, since it did not have an internal complaint channel. 

With this Sentence, the validity of anonymous complaints is determined to report a criminal act, and an internal investigation can be initiated without the need for the complainant to identify himself.

There are other rulings related to anonymous reporting, such as that of the Madrid Superior Court of Social Justice, which handed down a ruling on February 15, 2019, in which an airline worker reports through an internal channel of the company and, After the complaint, the worker begins to be harassed, causing sick leave due to temporary disability. In this case, the company is ordered to compensate the plaintiff for damages. 

It is evident therefore that the preservation of anonymity is intended to avoid retaliation and possible occupational risks to whistleblowers. 

After the approval of Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10/23/2019, it will be mandatory for a large part of public and private entities to have an internal Whistleblowing Channel. This Directive will ensure that workers can report any breach of European regulations that occurs within an organization through channels that guarantee the safety of the whistleblower. 

Member States must implement the provisions of this Directive on December 17, 2021, except for private entities that have between 50 and 249 workers, which will have 2 more years to implement internal reporting channels. 

Legal Counsel & Compliance IBERIA in Athlon - Mercedes-Benz AG Group

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay up to date with all the news

Basic information on data protection.
Responsible for the treatment: Mainjobs Internacional Educativa y Tecnológica SAU
Purpose: Manage your subscription to the newsletter.
Legitimation for processing: Explicit consent of the interested party granted when requesting registration.
Transfer of data: No data will be transferred to third parties, except under legal obligation.
Rights: You may exercise the rights of Access, Rectification, Deletion, Opposition, Portability and, where applicable, Limitation, as explained in the additional information.
Additional information: You can consult additional and detailed information on Data Protection at https://www.mainfor.edu.es/politica-privacidad
Blog Master Dpo

Leave a comment